Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Melissa Harrison's avatar

This kind of local conflict is often incredibly complex and in my experience there can be a lot to understand about it before any changes can successfully be made. There can be a class element, which needs to be treated carefully (order and neatness can signify respectability/integration/pride/moral character in some communities; greater social/economic confidence are often required before people are comfortable with their homes and gardens (which represent them publicly, which are their public 'face') to appear 'disordered'. There can also be an element of loyalty to parents' way of doing things and the sense that by admitting that weedkiller/tidiness are damaging we are implicitly criticising the environment in which we were brought up: people have varying degrees of comfort with that. And then there can be the sense that change is being imposed by newcomers/outsiders, which (understandably) creates resistance. Overcoming all that takes communication and patience and humour and compromise. The pro-nature argument isn't enough; there's often too much else going on under the surface.

I've found that sometimes what works is to work with the sense of local/personal pride instead of against it by replacing one set of targets with another. Even to go as far as creating a sense of competition, ie 'how many types of bird has our street got compared to the next one along?'

Expand full comment
Leonard Neamtu's avatar

How can someone hate having that in their backyard?!

Then again, I saw people that moved from their flat to a house only to pour cement in every corner of the garden.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?